|
|
Post by Freedom Fighter on Oct 20, 2004 23:25:19 GMT -5
I ran across this map of the Fort a la Corne area showing all the various claims: www.explorationgis.com/falc_detail.htmlThe organization publishing it seems reputable. However, the CMKX claim shows as smaller & north of the De Beers claim. It's on the map, but not in the index of claim holders. Yet I had understood that CMKX claims were much larger (1.4 million acres) and actually surrounded the De Beers claim (about 58,000 acres). There is a large area (in yellow) named as "101047025 SK" that seems to fit the description I had understood of CMKX's claims. Can anyone clarify for me what CMKX claims are? Is this a reliable map source? Thanks for your input. Terry |
|
|
|
Post by VNGNTN1 on Oct 21, 2004 7:53:30 GMT -5
FREEDOM
You have placed a finger on one of the negative things I have spent a lot of time on. NO ANSWERS I cannot prove more than 27 claims with the companys name on them and none of those are in area we are drilling AND have given away 75% of rights on those to JV partners.
I have emailed the company four times; 2times requesting list of claims & where filed and 2 times requested at least posting the claim & permits on website for current drill. NO ANSWER
- - - -
I have left this HUGE discrepancy to FAITH that God has it in hand.
VAN
|
|
|
|
Post by georger on Oct 21, 2004 10:06:04 GMT -5
See CMKX earlier filings that indicate names claims bought under.
See Saskachewan, LTD and Nevada Minerals on the spreadsheet. Big chunk west and northwest to Green Lake. West of DeBeers.
Headed out the door to Lake Charles, LA. Can be of further help if you need, later.
rc
|
|
DiamondSurfer
Junior Partner
Heaven is paved with precious stones and Jesus is the Crown Jewel
Posts: 37
|
Post by DiamondSurfer on Oct 21, 2004 10:07:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by VNGNTN1 on Oct 21, 2004 10:24:31 GMT -5
YES Ihave seen all of those, Certainly if you PR this type of data it can be simply backedup with a piece of paper/
SO not sure I agree!
VAN
|
|
|
|
Post by groupw on Oct 21, 2004 14:34:50 GMT -5
If you go to the CMKM website www.casavantmining.com/ and click on "mining locations", they show the property they have staked mineral claims. If they have this available at their website, there should be no need for a press release. If you click on the printable version of the map it gives more info. The second paragraph reads: "The company now has over 1,000,000 (one million) acres claimed in Saskatchewan which include Fort a la Corne claims and Green Lake claims. CMKM Diamonds, Inc. recently initiated a drill program, with confirmed results of one of the thickest kimberlite bodies found to date in the Fort a la Corne area. Initial geological reports indicate a high probability of locating diamonds on this land as the kimberlite pipes (the material in which diamonds are generally found) are in abundance on a number of the claims in the area. Reports show that thede kimberlite pipes are approximately twenty times larger than normally found. Additional targets are scheduled for diamond core sampling for the rest of 2004/05. While continuing to focus on Fort a la Corne, CMKX Diamonds, Inc. is remaining proactive in expanding their asset base through target acquisition elsewhere in Canada and arround the world." Why "CMKM Diamonds, Inc." in the begining and "CMKX Diamonds, Inc." at the end? Probably a typo... |
|
|
|
Post by VNGNTN1 on Oct 21, 2004 15:26:37 GMT -5
You are completely missing my point !
If you(company ABC) files a claim for "coal" on my property I can go to the local government agency and see that document with My name & ABC company and the mineral designation. If the company is buying claims with company money then claims must be filed in that name or it "defrauds shareholders" I am not suggesting anything, just very frustrated that a simple process cannot be verified.
I guess I don't trust anyone until i can verify a little of what they say.
VAN
|
|
|
|
Post by Fasttrackermo on Oct 21, 2004 15:55:07 GMT -5
CMKX has been collecting mineral right for about 15 years. What they did though is most of the claims are in different people's names. I was told that UC has a lot of friends that helped him acquire these.
Thing is if the Dabeers knew that UC was buying all these claims up we would have been bought out.
That is why you don't see a lot of the claims in there name, but they are ours trust me. It is all part of the plan. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by VNGNTN1 on Oct 21, 2004 15:58:28 GMT -5
FAST
I ABSOLUTELY REJECT THAT LOGIC.
VAN
|
|
|
|
Post by Fasttrackermo on Oct 21, 2004 16:42:15 GMT -5
Why would you reject that? Well I will not give out names, but it was told to me by a friend of UC
This assures that we are not bought out by Dabeers.
I think it makes total sense. You need to remember that UC has a lot of friends that live in Canada. But take it however you want that is how he was able to go over the Dabeers heads without them seeing.
|
|
|
|
Post by groupw on Oct 21, 2004 17:10:26 GMT -5
Van...Do we know who owns the land?
|
|
|
|
Post by hxpe on Oct 21, 2004 17:16:00 GMT -5
Check out Emmerson Koch. A lot of the claims are in his name. He's also listed as "secretary" in the corporate structure of CMKX.
I also agree with Van. However, the logic behind putting claims in multiple names other than Casavant was one of stealth--- they did not want to alert DeBeers. I did not say I agree --- just reporting what was done.
|
|
|
|
Post by VNGNTN1 on Oct 21, 2004 17:16:26 GMT -5
FAST
A real company does not do business this way: This puts the shareholder at the Mercy & Good graces of the claim holder; who may decide to capitalize on the new found bananza should the CEO die-NOT ACCEPTABLE. and your contact is third party, so is rumor. Not a slam at you just takes a lessor precedence to other information.
This is my quaulifying ordination process
1-Legal documentation
2-Auditing of a professional document
3-Public documentation
4-Corporate officer statement
5-PR
6-Respected Commetator of PR with track record
7-Associate statement of immediate Insider
8-Statement of unrelated party of heresay verified by another of same heresay.
9-Rumor by trusted poster
10-Associate of associate of immediate insiderThis is where I place your info
A PR stating that various insiders hold claims in companys name would suffice.
VAN
|
|
|
|
Post by Freedom Fighter on Oct 21, 2004 20:29:38 GMT -5
Wonderful responses. Thanks to all. You've given me a lot of data to think about. I've been out all day & evening, so it will take me a while to wade thru this. Although it sounds like we have little of substance yet that clearly identifies the bulk of the claims as belonging to CMKX.
I believe God brought me to this investment and forum and it is in his hands. Nevertheless, I too, like Van, like to understand and validate the details.
I really appreciate everyone on this board. Many counselors brings success.
Van, a special Thank You to you for your intellectual honesty, fervent DD and willingness to be frank in your respnses. We are all blessed by your participation here.
May God Bless you all. ;D ;D ;D ;D
Terry
|
|
